It’s 4 solutions to 4 questions. Here we go…
1. My husband’s boss keeps texting me
My husband and I work for a similar firm, in roles that have completely nothing to do with one another. We’re each very long-term staff (he’s obtained 20+ years of seniority and I’ve 18+). On two separate events, as soon as on a Saturday and one other when my husband was on deliberate PTO, she reached out to me to ask him to contact her. Neither time was a true emergency, and our firm follows the usual Monday – Friday, 8-5 schedule. I’m guessing she obtained my quantity from his emergency contact info, and I’m fighting the way to reply if/when she reaches out once more, particularly when she has his quantity!
Am I completely out of line in pondering it’s wildly inappropriate for her to contact me when she wants to talk to him? If I didn’t additionally work there I extremely doubt she could be calling or texting me… While I don’t report into her a part of the corporate in any manner, she is a director so I must tread calmly, however how can I politely inform her that until there may be a true challenge and she is reaching out to me as my husband’s emergency contact, that I desire she not attain out to me when she wants to talk to him?
“Bob and I want to be disciplined about keeping a firewall between our work stuff, so please only use this number like other emergency contacts (not to try to find him). I appreciate it and hope you’re well!”
Alternately, you may ask your husband to say his personal model of that to her.
Related:
my boss saved calling my spouse to search out me … and now he received’t cease texting her apologies for all of the calls
2. My coworker received’t cease touching and complimenting me
I work in a giant warehouse-type atmosphere. I’m a very pleasant particular person and don’t thoughts giving hiya hugs to a few of my pals at work, male or feminine. However, I’ve one male coworker who can’t appear to keep it skilled. He could be very candy however continuously touches me. Every time he sees me, he desires to hug me, over 5 instances a day, and doesn’t all the time let go. It bothers me and I really feel this goes effectively previous a stage of regular.
I lastly instructed him it bothers me, so now he resorts to rubbing my shoulder or higher again when he’s strolling by me. He additionally places his head on my shoulder whereas saying, “I know you don’t like hugs but here’s a head butt.” He additionally continuously seeks me out at work. He can’t simply stroll by with out stopping to see me. He can also be continuously complimenting me, calling me fairly, saying my pores and skin appears delicate … you title it. He is definitely actually bothering me. I’m fortunately married and make that very clear. I ask him to cease the compliments and he doesn’t appear to get it. He is a type of overly candy teddy bear sorts, and I don’t assume he’s hitting on me. But it’s attending to a level the place I’m hating being at work when he’s there too.
Is there a option to have him again off with out being imply? I’ve tried to overly keep away from him, like working in the wrong way when he spots me down an aisle. Sometimes he follows me to the break room after I’m making an attempt to eat and I stand up and go away. He nonetheless appears to strive and discover me. Now my husband stated he’s going to go to my workplace and have a chat with this man. I don’t assume that’s the best way to deal with it and I really feel dangerous going to HR since I’ve allowed the hugs and touching for too lengthy. It’s arduous for me to face up for myself. Should I let my husband deal with it? Should I am going to HR or simply keep performing chilly and working away when he approaches me?
You’ve already tried to get him to again off with out being imply and he’s pointedly not listening to you, so you could get more direct! It’s not imply to say, “Do not touch me at all, and stop complimenting me. It’s inappropriate and unwelcome.” It’s additionally not imply to say, “I can’t talk when you walk by, I need to focus on work.” And be happy so as to add, “This is the last time I’m telling you, and after this I’ll. need to go to HR.” Frankly, I’d argue it’s the other of imply — as a result of proper now he’s actually bothering you and if he’s genuinely a good man, that’s one thing he’d need to know so he can cease. If he hears that message and both doesn’t cease or will get offended about it, then he was by no means a good man and that’s all of the more motive to obviously inform him to chop it out.
Or in case you’d fairly simply go straight to HR at this level, you may. You haven’t “allowed the hugs and touching for too long”; you’ve been making an attempt to get him to cease, and he’s ignored you. HR has a vested curiosity in not permitting one worker to harass one other, and you might have clear standing to go to them at this level. (But don’t let your husband present up and discuss to this man — that could be a lot of pointless drama, implies the habits could be advantageous if solely you weren’t married, and might undermine you at work.)
3. Continuing to interview candidates after a proposal has been accepted
My companion has instructed me about (what I feel is) a bizarre hiring apply at her firm and I wished your tackle if that is regular. So the scenario is:
– They have made a proposal to a candidate who has eagerly accepted.
– However, they nonetheless have a number of (possibly three or 4) candidates within the course of who they’ve scheduled second stage interviews with.
– The inner recruiter is saying they’ve a rule to all the time honour interviews that have been scheduled, and so these interviews ought to nonetheless go forward.When I heard this, I used to be astonished! I really feel prefer it’s a huge waste of everybody’s time (the candidates’ and the folks doing the interviews). The recruiter justified this by saying it’s simply in case issues don’t work out with the candidate who has accepted the supply, but additionally to see if there are any good candidates that they will keep observe of for any future roles. They’re not going to inform the candidates they’ve already supplied, which is admittedly unfair to the candidates in my opinion. Is this regular?
No! It’s impolite and thoughtless — they’re principally interviewing these candidates beneath false pretenses. Some or all of these persons are going to take time without work work, rearrange plans, possibly purchase a new interviewing outfit … all of that are issues they may select to decide out of in the event that they knew the job was now not accessible (to say nothing of how unkind it’s to ask them to endure a course of a lot of individuals discover fairly anxious when there’s no chance of a job on the finish of it).
Most firms on this scenario merely cancel any remaining interviews and clarify why. That recruiter sucks.
4. Responding to a job advert that violates a native pay transparency regulation
I just lately got here throughout a job posting that appears tailored for my area of interest talent set as an legal professional. The job posting indicated that candidates have been welcome to submit a cowl letter “with salary expectations.” The posting didn’t record the minimal and most wage vary for the place, which violates our metropolis’s pay transparency regulation (and soon-to-be state regulation). Our native regulation went into impact more than eight months in the past, so it shouldn’t be a massive shock to the regulation agency.
There was no option to keep away from indicating these “salary expectations” as a result of functions have been solely accepted by way of the agency web site which had a required subject for the applicant’s wage expectations.
Assuming that the agency was unaware of the native regulation, I initially drafted a cowl letter that omitted any reference to my wage vary however included a mild suggestion that the agency evaluate the posting to make sure compliance with the native regulation (and to keep away from potential fines and legal responsibility). I ended up scrapping it as a result of it was too troublesome to strike the correct stability between “hire me, I’m perfect for the position” and “heads-up, you’re violating the law.” Plus, I couldn’t overlook the likelihood that the agency was purposefully flouting the native regulation.
I made a decision to not apply for the job as a result of the violation looks like a crimson flag, even when the agency doesn’t concentrate on employment regulation. I despatched an nameless e-mail via the agency’s web site to inform them of the violation. I initially thought that could be the top of it, however the violation began to eat away at me, so I made an nameless tip to the town fee liable for implementing the native regulation. As a first step, the agency will obtain discover of the violation and a possibility to treatment, in any other case pretty heavy fines can be imposed.
Is a pay transparency violation an absolute deal breaker? Having gone via a few drafts of the quilt letter, I’ve reached the conclusion that it’s unattainable to softly chide a potential employer about a violation and nonetheless categorical curiosity within the place. What do you assume?
I don’t know that it needs to be an absolute deal breaker, but it surely’s a massive crimson flag. (I’d add “particularly for a law firm,” however over time I’ve seen that regulation corporations that don’t concentrate on employment regulation are simply as oblivious about it as every other sort of employer.) If you have been in any other case very within the job/the corporate, I might see transferring ahead with their course of however holding your eyes open for different crimson flags, and additionally doing a lot of due diligence behind the scenes earlier than accepting a job with them.
I agree that it’s robust to level out a authorized violation when you’re on the identical time hoping they’ll rent you. But if the choice will not be making use of in any respect, you don’t have anything to lose by making use of and together with a brief, matter-of-fact “by the way, I thought you’d want to know…” along with your supplies. And in the event that they name you for an interview after that, it might even be a good signal about their willingness to listen to suggestions. But it’s additionally completely authentic to resolve “no thanks” and report the violation to the town, as you probably did.
