Container shippers are ordering vessels powered by methanol to scale back greenhouse fuel emissions, however it should take years for renewable methanol output to fulfill demand and for prices to fall, trade executives mentioned.
The first inexperienced methanol-fuelled container ship, owned by A.P. Moller-Maersk, sailed from South Korea in July. The variety of such vessels is anticipated to exceed 200 by 2028, up from 30 this 12 months, consultancy DNV forecasts.
Container giants comparable to A.P. Moller-Maersk, CMA CGM and XpressFeeders dominate the order books. They ship shopper items for corporations together with Apple, Nike, Adidas and Walmart and are betting on methanol, in addition to exploring different much less developed choices comparable to ammonia, to fulfill their very own and purchasers’ emission discount targets.
Maersk mentioned methanol-powered ships with dual-fuel choices value about 10%-12% greater than typical ships, however the worth distinction ought to develop into insignificant within the longer run as soon as builders obtain economies of scale.
The challenges of delivering sufficient gas, nonetheless, are appreciable and emissions is not going to be solely eradicated.
“The real cost challenge remains on the fuel supply side and the need to rapidly build production globally and at scale; and the associated fuel infrastructure,” Emma Mazhari, Maersk’s head of power markets, informed Reuters.
Conventional methanol emits as much as 80% much less nitrogen oxides and cuts almost 99% of sulphur oxide emissions versus gas oil, however it nonetheless emits planet-warming carbon dioxide.
Using methanol, produced both from biomass or captured carbon and hydrogen from renewable energy, can scale back carbon dioxide emissions from container ships by 60% to 95% in contrast with typical fuels, the Methanol Institute mentioned.
But inexperienced methanol, produced from biomass or captured carbon and hydrogen from renewable energy, is scarce and prices a minimum of twice as a lot as typical methanol, produced from fossil gas, trade insiders say.
The renewable gas’s manufacturing can be removed from the bunkering hubs, the place ships refuel, which means further prices by way of cash and emissions for transportation, they added.
“It still has a ‘C’ (carbon) in its formula so the fuel that remains is not zero carbon,” mentioned Rashpal Singh Bhatti, BHP’s vice chairman for maritime and provide chain excellence, referring to traditional methanol.
He added utilizing methanol produced utilizing fossil gas was pointless by way of lowering emissions.
“Ultimately, we’re trying to find the ubiquitous source that has good decarbonisation potential,” he mentioned.
Global demand for methanol, sometimes utilized in development and manufacturing, stands at 100 million tonnes per 12 months (tpy), whereas a 16,000-TEU container ship consumes 30,000 to 40,000 tpy, the Methanol Institute mentioned.
Methanol demand might develop by an extra 6-to-8 million tonnes per 12 months in 2028, primarily based on Reuters calculations and the vessels on order.
However, bio-methanol gives lower than 1% of world manufacturing, at between 300,000 and 400,000 tonnes as of final 12 months, based on the Methanol Institute, which suggests ships for now should rely primarily on extra typical fuels.
“The main issue with methanol at this stage is increasing access and the scale of green production,” Peter Lye, world head of transport at Anglo American, mentioned. He mentioned the corporate was monitoring progress however had but to put an order for such ships.
LOCATIONS
Shippers hope that their investments in methanol-fuelled ships will spur manufacturing of the renewable gas and decrease prices in the long term.
“We are tracking more than 90 projects globally looking to produce bio-methanol or e-methanol, with total announced anticipated production capacity of 8 million tonnes by 2027,” the Methanol Institute’s CEO Greg Dolan mentioned, including that the dimensions of the crops being constructed has grown to 50,000-250,000 tonnes per 12 months from 4,000-10,000 tonnes beforehand.
Netherlands-based OCI, which provided inexperienced methanol to Maersk’s first ship, can produce as much as 200,000 tpy of the renewable gas.
Bashir Lebada, CEO of OCI’s methanol and fuels enterprise, mentioned the vessel orders have given suppliers a confidence enhance in advancing their inexperienced methanol initiatives although manufacturing is “very small” now.
Most inexperienced methanol initiatives are positioned in China, northern Europe and North America – removed from main bunker hubs Singapore and the United Arab Emirates, making a logistical hole.
Costs will come down as manufacturing will increase over the subsequent 15-to-20 years from lower than 1% of output now, mentioned Anita Gajadhar, Proman’s government director for advertising, logistics and transport, including that extra international locations, comparable to Chile and Argentina, have potential to make inexperienced methanol.
Within Asia, South Korea and China are set to extend their capability to gas ships with inexperienced methanol.
“Strategically this makes sense given the available methanol storage volumes and the port’s proximity to the major Asian dockyards handling the majority of methanol newbuild orders,” mentioned Gajadhar, including that a number of Chinese ports may even have a large demand requirement in future.
Maersk has set itself a aim to make use of low-emission fuels to move 1 / 4 of its volumes by 2030.
(Reporting by Jeslyn Lerh in Singapore and Jacob Gronholt-Pedersen in Copenhagen; Additional reporting by Johannes Birkebaek in Copenhagen; Editing by Florence Tan and Barbara Lewis)
