Measuring the efficiency of a enterprise goes hand in glove with its enterprise technique. Or it ought to. But surprisingly, as I’ve witnessed firsthand over an prolonged interval, organizations in all sectors wrestle to match their technique design with their efficiency measurement.

This is vastly necessary as a result of it’s virtually unattainable to trace the success of a enterprise technique if there are not any dependable key efficiency indicators (KPIs). Conversely, poor efficiency measurement can encourage misdirected strategic targets. Both can result in repeat performances of the identical failed choices.

Here I discover three widespread traps that managers fall into when measuring their technique’s efficiency and clarify learn how to keep away from them.

1. Non-matching frameworks

Roger is the CEO of a state authorities’s essential roads division. When he was appointed, he put in his favored technique framework primarily based on “areas.” These got here with their very own acronym – KRAs, key outcome areas. So, he organized the primary roads strategic plan beneath objects similar to power discount, governance, and materials sourcing.

The bother was that it didn’t match essential roads’ present efficiency measurement framework, which was organized round applications similar to highway security, highway effectivity, and highway upkeep.

The disconnect was vastly dysfunctional with a lot govt time and power expended making an attempt to make issues work. As one govt wryly noticed, “it was like trying to put parts of a Ford into a Mercedes Benz. They just wouldn’t fit.”

How to repair it: Organize round key stakeholders.

Marjorie heads up a not-for-profit entity which takes care of folks with autism. When she joined the group as CEO, she was confronted with what she describes as “a disconnect between our strategic planning framework and how our KPIs were assembled.”

The group’s strategic plan was structured round “key issues” like finances overruns, acquiring grants, and hiring employees. The KPIs had been a hotchpotch of metrics drawn from quite a lot of sources together with HR, accounting and finance, and operations together with working bills and the variety of employees coaching programs run.

Her answer was to refocus each technique and the KPIs across the group’s key stakeholders. These had been folks with autism and their households, authorities, donors and supporters, and employees.

For instance, within the case of the stakeholder employees, Marjorie’s group needed to ratchet up innovation across the companies they offered for folks with autism and their households. This required attracting first-rate clinicians by boosting the group’s place on employment circumstances. One indicator of success was a rise within the variety of job functions from suitably certified psychologists. “At last,” she says, “our organization’s strategic plan and scorecard can speak to each other.”

2. Measuring exercise

Here’s how I illustrate this downside to teams of managers at my workshops. I say to them: “I propose to measure my performance today by measuring the number of slides I use. And if I’m really tired at the end of the day I’ll know I’ve done a good job. Would you be happy with those as measures of my performance?”

My viewers all the time says no. “Why?” I ask. “Because they’re measures of activity, not of results,” they are saying. “And who decides on those results ?” I inquire. “We do,” comes the common response. In that second my viewers “gets it.” I can see it of their faces.

How to repair it: Focus on outcomes.

Angelo heads up the nationwide workplace of a well known model of development instruments. When it got here to measuring the efficiency of his enterprise, he defined: “We would get together and focus on what we do. The KPIs we produced were invariably about processes.” They broke this fixation by specializing in the outcomes his group produced for its key stakeholders – prospects, suppliers, staff, and the father or mother firm.

Measuring this efficiency entails a two-way road with outcomes going each methods – for the enterprise and for stakeholders. Angelo and his crew averted making assumptions about what the outcomes can be for his or her stakeholders. Instead, they interviewed key stakeholders to be taught if the outcomes necessary to them had been recognized. The interviews additionally revealed new KPIs that Angelo and his crew would by no means have considered.

3. Lack of focus

Sebastian is CEO of a suburban council. He needed to develop a scorecard of the council’s efficiency linked to the council’s strategic plan. So, he collected measures from departments under him, similar to group growth, atmosphere and planning, and company companies, and he created a composite record. This record was lengthy and left him dissatisfied. Many of the measures didn’t appear in any respect associated to the council’s goals.

How to repair it: Cascade moderately than amalgamate your metrics.

Helen is a newly put in principal of a big, prestigious, and really costly non-public women’ college. To develop a scorecard for the college, she gathered measures from educational departments similar to science, English and arithmetic. But, as with Sebastian, the composite set of KPIs didn’t work as measures of the college’s efficiency.

She mounted this by beginning once more. This time, moderately than amalgamating measures from backside to prime, she developed KPIs within the reverse order — from prime to backside. The course of she says, “allowed me to kill two birds with the one stone. It uncovered gaps in the KPI set for the school and provided a fit between the school’s strategic plan around students, parents, teachers and staff, government, [and] the community… [It also] provided an effective scorecard based on the results for these same groups.”

Helen had discovered a basic idea in efficiency measurement – degree of research. Measures that apply at one degree, e.g., revenue on the company degree, don’t apply at one other degree, e.g., an inner division like HR. Similarly, measures which might be apt at a division degree aren’t acceptable on the company degree.

. . .

It’s simple for gaps to develop between your strategic plan and your KPIs should you don’t apply a framework constantly throughout each – and also you’re actually not alone if this has occurred to you.  As you shut the gaps, nevertheless, keep in mind above all that measuring efficiency is basically about measuring your relationships along with your group’s key stakeholders.  Your KPIs, subsequently, must be formed by what these stakeholders count on from you and never by what you suppose you ought to be doing.